<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Herkinderkin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.herkinderkin.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.herkinderkin.com</link>
	<description>Musings of a grumpy old man</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on NZ Army sells bad Bullets to the Public? by JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.herkinderkin.com/2010/03/nz-army-sells-bad-bullets-to-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herkinderkin.com/?p=889#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.  I guess this means that they are specifically designed for target practice and therefore unsuitable as live military ammunition.

So they are simply a bad batch, unfit for the purpose of target ammo for miltary rifles.  Already there are two degrees of separation from the army&#039;s stewardship of the bullets - the NZ dealer and now the American one.  And I am left with two questions:

Presumably they are still unsuitable for the newer civilian rifles that have a spin rate comparable to the Steyrs, so isn&#039;t there still some risk?

Acciidants happen.  If the the bullets are used for hunting, what happens on impact with an animal (or a man)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  I guess this means that they are specifically designed for target practice and therefore unsuitable as live military ammunition.</p>
<p>So they are simply a bad batch, unfit for the purpose of target ammo for miltary rifles.  Already there are two degrees of separation from the army&#8217;s stewardship of the bullets &#8211; the NZ dealer and now the American one.  And I am left with two questions:</p>
<p>Presumably they are still unsuitable for the newer civilian rifles that have a spin rate comparable to the Steyrs, so isn&#8217;t there still some risk?</p>
<p>Acciidants happen.  If the the bullets are used for hunting, what happens on impact with an animal (or a man)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NZ Army sells bad Bullets to the Public? by JED</title>
		<link>http://www.herkinderkin.com/2010/03/nz-army-sells-bad-bullets-to-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>JED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herkinderkin.com/?p=889#comment-54</guid>
		<description>The ammo is saqfe to use - it is just unsuitable to use in the Army rifles because the rifling in their barrels spin them too fast and they come apart in the air after leaving the barrel.

Most civilian rifles are older and have slwer twist rifling so the bullet are not spun as fast. They do not disintergrate when fired from the correct type of barrel.

The bullets are not as strong so they will break up when they hit the ground - as a safety feature to prevent them bouncing off the ground and out of rifle ranges.

They are weak enough so they come apart if spun too fast.
But are perfectly safe to fire from suitable civilian firearms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ammo is saqfe to use &#8211; it is just unsuitable to use in the Army rifles because the rifling in their barrels spin them too fast and they come apart in the air after leaving the barrel.</p>
<p>Most civilian rifles are older and have slwer twist rifling so the bullet are not spun as fast. They do not disintergrate when fired from the correct type of barrel.</p>
<p>The bullets are not as strong so they will break up when they hit the ground &#8211; as a safety feature to prevent them bouncing off the ground and out of rifle ranges.</p>
<p>They are weak enough so they come apart if spun too fast.<br />
But are perfectly safe to fire from suitable civilian firearms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Icebergs &#8211; Global Warming or Local Cooling? by JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.herkinderkin.com/2010/01/icebergs-global-warming-or-local-cooling/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herkinderkin.com/?p=483#comment-27</guid>
		<description>On the face of it, they are unrelated, in the sense that the glacial flow is ice formed by compressed snow.  Glacial flow is related to snowfall over a period of years, for that is the source of glaciers.  Sea ice forms when the sea is cools enough for it to form - simple as that.  In the Arctic, where the North Pole is in the middle of the sea, sea-ice can persist for years.  The South Pole is close to the middle of Antarctica, an island continent nearly as big as Australia, and the sea-ice around the rim is almost wholly seasonal.  Most of it disappears in the summer and it reforms in the winter.  As it warms and thins in the summer, wave-motion cracks it and it breaks up into vast floes.  Unlike glacial icebergs, which calve off the face of glaciers as they reach the sea, the floes are flat.  The icebergs seen off the coast of NZ last year are of this type - huge ice floes.

Having said that, the presence of thick sea-ice at the mouth of a glacier can inhibit calving for years, so that the glacial flow juts out from the mouth, sometimes so consolidated that it survives the summer melt of the sea-ice.  When it finally calves, either from its own weight or from the impact of a floating iceberg, it can create a super-iceberg.  That is the type of iceberg reported this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the face of it, they are unrelated, in the sense that the glacial flow is ice formed by compressed snow.  Glacial flow is related to snowfall over a period of years, for that is the source of glaciers.  Sea ice forms when the sea is cools enough for it to form &#8211; simple as that.  In the Arctic, where the North Pole is in the middle of the sea, sea-ice can persist for years.  The South Pole is close to the middle of Antarctica, an island continent nearly as big as Australia, and the sea-ice around the rim is almost wholly seasonal.  Most of it disappears in the summer and it reforms in the winter.  As it warms and thins in the summer, wave-motion cracks it and it breaks up into vast floes.  Unlike glacial icebergs, which calve off the face of glaciers as they reach the sea, the floes are flat.  The icebergs seen off the coast of NZ last year are of this type &#8211; huge ice floes.</p>
<p>Having said that, the presence of thick sea-ice at the mouth of a glacier can inhibit calving for years, so that the glacial flow juts out from the mouth, sometimes so consolidated that it survives the summer melt of the sea-ice.  When it finally calves, either from its own weight or from the impact of a floating iceberg, it can create a super-iceberg.  That is the type of iceberg reported this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Icebergs &#8211; Global Warming or Local Cooling? by Steve A Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.herkinderkin.com/2010/01/icebergs-global-warming-or-local-cooling/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve A Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herkinderkin.com/?p=483#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Do we know if the increase in sea ice attributed to the flow of glaciers or is the sea ice formation unrelated to glaciers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we know if the increase in sea ice attributed to the flow of glaciers or is the sea ice formation unrelated to glaciers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why is Venus much hotter than Earth? by No Warming Since 1995 - Jones? - Page 11</title>
		<link>http://www.herkinderkin.com/2009/11/why-is-venus-much-hotter-than-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>No Warming Since 1995 - Jones? - Page 11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herkinderkin.com/?p=309#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] flawed. The following link has an explanation of why Venus developed the climate it has:  Why is Venus much hotter than Earth? &#124; Herkinderkin  Perhaps Hansen is a bit eccentric and Nye is sychophanting up to him. Or perhaps Nye is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] flawed. The following link has an explanation of why Venus developed the climate it has:  Why is Venus much hotter than Earth? | Herkinderkin  Perhaps Hansen is a bit eccentric and Nye is sychophanting up to him. Or perhaps Nye is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Phil Jones on modern Global Warming Rates by JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.herkinderkin.com/2010/02/phil-jones-on-modern-global-warming-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herkinderkin.com/?p=660#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Indeed, you are right.  His (acting) successor is yet to learn that.  So is Pachauri.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, you are right.  His (acting) successor is yet to learn that.  So is Pachauri.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Phil Jones on modern Global Warming Rates by bushy</title>
		<link>http://www.herkinderkin.com/2010/02/phil-jones-on-modern-global-warming-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>bushy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herkinderkin.com/?p=660#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I think that Jones has no option now but to be truthful or at least not obviously deceptive. There is too much attention being paid to what these folk say now for them to put their foot in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Jones has no option now but to be truthful or at least not obviously deceptive. There is too much attention being paid to what these folk say now for them to put their foot in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Climate Models and Scientific Consensus &#8211; why they prove Nothing by JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.herkinderkin.com/2010/01/climate-models-and-scientific-consensus-why-they-prove-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herkinderkin.com/?p=471#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Climate Models and Scientific Consensus &#8211; why they prove Nothing by ted</title>
		<link>http://www.herkinderkin.com/2010/01/climate-models-and-scientific-consensus-why-they-prove-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herkinderkin.com/?p=471#comment-16</guid>
		<description>A brilliant example of concensus baloney.  Kudos to you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A brilliant example of concensus baloney.  Kudos to you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best and Worst Thing about the Netherlands by JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.herkinderkin.com/2009/11/the-best-and-worst-thing-about-the-netherlands/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herkinderkin.com/?p=299#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Have you ever been to Haarlem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever been to Haarlem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
