Climate scientists have developed new models which plot natural oceanic temperature cycles, solar activity, and cathode-ray-tube (CRT) television household penetration against average global temperatures over time. They show a surprising an unexpected result. The recent unprecedented change in climate appears to be closely related to the number of cathode ray television sets in use.
At the beginning of the second world war, there were only about 8000 sets in use. By 1949, there were over 3,602,872 in the US alone, and by 1959 accumulated sales in the US totalled more than 67 million. Sales continued through the 70s and 80s at over 10 million sets per year. As the global economy flourished, the trend was replicated all over the developing world. The studies showed that the globe warmed more and more rapidly, matching the rising numbers of TV sets, until around the turn of the millennium, when it paused for ten years, and now appears to be in decline.
Interestingly, the models hind-cast the temperature variations since 1950 with astonishing accuracy. And critically, when the CRT penetration is removed from the models, we cannot explain those temperature variations. There is no other acceptable conclusion, no other factor that can achieve the match with temperature variations.
Ah, I hear you object, China and India, the new Asian super-economies, are booming. The number of TV sets sold is sky-rocketing again. If Global Warming has ceased, how could it possibly be related to TV sets? Right now, the number of sets in use in the world is 1416338245.
Pay attention! TV technology has undergone a sea change. The cathode-ray tube is out. In the twenty-first century, flat-screen TFT and LED screens have taken over. These do not emit the same radiation as the older, earth-warming monsters that sat in the corner of the room and heated our planet. And as the old CRT screens sputter, distort and die, they are being replaced by the new, green, tree-hugging, polar-bear-loving flatties. We are saved!
Earlier climate models achieved a reasonable match using global CO2 atmospheric variations, enough to give cause to speculate that the reason for the rise might be CO2. But only to speculate. CO2 concentrations are still rising at an increasing rate, but the global temperature since 2000, initially flat, is now declining.
And that, dear readers, should be the end of the argument. I defy you to show me that this little analysis is any less robust or scientific than all of the scientific reports used by the IPCC, Al Gore, the EU or Skeptical Science. The data behind my reasoning shows a closer match to world temperature fluctuations than any of the computer models used by NASA, GISS or UEA.
Trust the science on this. Using our model, we can predict with 98.73% certainty that the temperature will decline for the next thirty years to at least the same level as it was in 1970. More likely it will be even lower, as by 2040 there will be very few CRTs still in use.
What’s that? You want to examine my data? You have a confounded cheek. It’s commercially sensitive and the TV companies have placed it under an embargo.
And I didn’t archive it, and seem to have lost it.